<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>systemic &#187; Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/tag/earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Too cheap to meter</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/12/too-cheap-to-meter/</link>
		<comments>http://oklo.org/2009/03/12/too-cheap-to-meter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[worlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpha Cen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habitable Planets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1803, the fledgling United States purchased the Louisiana Territory from France, and thereby entered into what has wound up being one of history&#8217;s better real estate deals. Napoleon, as the principle on the sell side, remarked at the time, &#8220;This accession of territory affirms forever the power of the United States, and I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.oklo.org/wp-content/images/uploadedfromtheair.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>In 1803, the fledgling United States purchased the Louisiana Territory from France, and thereby entered into what has wound up being one of history&#8217;s better real estate deals. Napoleon, as the principle on the sell side, remarked at the time, &#8220;<em>This accession of territory affirms forever the power of the United States, and I have given England a maritime rival who sooner or later will humble her pride.</em>&#8221; In somewhat typical fashion, the US House of Representatives was slower to grasp the stupendous advantage of the bargain, with Majority Leader John Randolph standing firmly against the purchase. Fortunately, a measure to axe the deal wound up failing by two votes, 59-57.</p>
<p>The Louisiana Purchase price was a (suspiciously spam-like) USD 15 million. For a payment of gold bullion and bonds, the United States obtained the entire western drainage of the Mississippi River. This constitutes ~2 million square miles, or roughly 1% of Earth&#8217;s ~200 million square mile total surface. Using the price of gold as a measure of inflation (<a href="http://www.measuringworth.org/datasets/gold/result.php">Gold was USD 19.39 per oz. in 1803</a>) the purchase in today&#8217;s currency was thus a mere USD 750 million.</p>
<p>Fast-forwarding two hundred years to the present, similarly good land deals are still to be had &#8212; not on Earth, but on potentially habitable terrestrial planets orbiting nearby stars! I think it&#8217;s fair to say that the successful launch of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_Mission">Kepler Mission</a> last weekend can be viewed as the first large-scale extraterrestrial land rush.</p>
<p>Oklo readers are doubtless familiar with the Kepler mission specs. The spacecraft will reside in an Earth-trailing orbit, and, during the 3.5-year mission will monitor ~100,000 main sequence stars with a photometric precision of 20ppm at 6.5h cadence. In all likelihood, it&#8217;ll detect of order 100 terrestrial planets. The total mission cost will be of order USD 600 million, <em>remarkably close to the cost of the Louisiana purchase in 2009 dollars</em>.</p>
<p>The advent of Kepler allows us to put meaningful prices on <em>terrestrial</em> extrasolar planets. I think the following valuation formula provides a reasonable start:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.oklo.org/wp-content/images/terrestrialvalue.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>where $\tau_{\star}$ is the age of the planet-bearing star, and V is the apparent visual magnitude. Kepler&#8217;s best planets are likely going to come in with valuations of order 30 million dollars.</p>
<p>Applying the formula to an exact Earth-analog orbiting Alpha Cen B, the value is boosted to 6.4 billion dollars, which seems to be the right order of magnitude.</p>
<p>And applying the formula to Earth (using the Sun&#8217;s apparent visual magnitude) one arrives at a figure close to 5 quadrillion dollars, which is roughly the economic value of Earth (~100x the Earth&#8217;s current yearly GDP)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oklo.org/2009/03/12/too-cheap-to-meter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

