<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: scenario two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/comment-page-1/#comment-20934</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=326#comment-20934</guid>
		<description>Well the HD 40307 velocities are now available, along with several other systems the links for which I have posted on the backend discussion forum. Would be nice to have them integrated into the backend system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the HD 40307 velocities are now available, along with several other systems the links for which I have posted on the backend discussion forum. Would be nice to have them integrated into the backend system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Much Is a Planet Worth?</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/comment-page-1/#comment-16997</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Much Is a Planet Worth?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=326#comment-16997</guid>
		<description>[...] to see that Laughlin believes the first planet to fit the former description will likely be discovered within the next year using radial velocity methods from the ground. His formula for calculating its value is worth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to see that Laughlin believes the first planet to fit the former description will likely be discovered within the next year using radial velocity methods from the ground. His formula for calculating its value is worth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: japf</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/comment-page-1/#comment-16930</link>
		<dc:creator>japf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=326#comment-16930</guid>
		<description>What defines the edge of announceability? Maybe, some professional thing equivalent to the F-test and stability test that eliminates all possible planets except the obvious ones. For the moment you cannot have less than 100% sure before announcing a new planet.  
A statistical test based on the systemic survey could lower the level of exigence, allowing announcements with a degree of confident smaller than 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What defines the edge of announceability? Maybe, some professional thing equivalent to the F-test and stability test that eliminates all possible planets except the obvious ones. For the moment you cannot have less than 100% sure before announcing a new planet.<br />
A statistical test based on the systemic survey could lower the level of exigence, allowing announcements with a degree of confident smaller than 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2009/03/22/scenario-two/comment-page-1/#comment-16874</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=326#comment-16874</guid>
		<description>The Venus calculation comes out nicely dead (10^-84 dollars) if you use the actual surface temperature instead of the black body temperature.  So the problem isn&#039;t a valuation problem so much as it is a real scientific issue of not being able to deduce atmospheric properties from basic bulk planetary data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Venus calculation comes out nicely dead (10^-84 dollars) if you use the actual surface temperature instead of the black body temperature.  So the problem isn&#8217;t a valuation problem so much as it is a real scientific issue of not being able to deduce atmospheric properties from basic bulk planetary data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

