<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sirius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2008/11/25/sirius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2008/11/25/sirius/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/11/25/sirius/comment-page-1/#comment-10193</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=301#comment-10193</guid>
		<description>What is the probability that the brightest close star in any given run will be brighter than Canopus?  That might give us a better feel for how unusual it is for bright and close to be correlated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the probability that the brightest close star in any given run will be brighter than Canopus?  That might give us a better feel for how unusual it is for bright and close to be correlated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/11/25/sirius/comment-page-1/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=301#comment-10192</guid>
		<description>Cool point. To zeroth order, that&#039;s correct.

 Sirius is almost exactly twice the distance of Alpha Cen. Main sequence A stars like Sirius are, however, somewhat more than 8x rarer than early K main sequence stars like Alpha Cen B. The shortfall in bright Sirius-type stars (to get to ~3% for both) is made up by the scattering of somewhat evolved stars in the local 25pc volume. Also, the 1-sigma error on the 3% &quot;unusualnesses&quot;  in the particular simulation that I did is ~(sqrt(30)/30)*0.03, which is ~0.5% for both stars. Were I a perfectionist, I would have stated 3+/-0.5% for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool point. To zeroth order, that&#8217;s correct.</p>
<p> Sirius is almost exactly twice the distance of Alpha Cen. Main sequence A stars like Sirius are, however, somewhat more than 8x rarer than early K main sequence stars like Alpha Cen B. The shortfall in bright Sirius-type stars (to get to ~3% for both) is made up by the scattering of somewhat evolved stars in the local 25pc volume. Also, the 1-sigma error on the 3% &#8220;unusualnesses&#8221;  in the particular simulation that I did is ~(sqrt(30)/30)*0.03, which is ~0.5% for both stars. Were I a perfectionist, I would have stated 3+/-0.5% for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/11/25/sirius/comment-page-1/#comment-10191</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=301#comment-10191</guid>
		<description>So does the ratio of A stars to K stars equal the cube of the ratio of the distances between those two systems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does the ratio of A stars to K stars equal the cube of the ratio of the distances between those two systems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

