<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worlds worlds worlds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry4info2</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry4info2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=281#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>Unsurprisingly, habitability stores are circulating around. With all of the candidates having periods less than 50 days, I don&#039;t think habitability is a very likely aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsurprisingly, habitability stores are circulating around. With all of the candidates having periods less than 50 days, I don&#8217;t think habitability is a very likely aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IAU: COROT&#8217;s Unusual Catch and More</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IAU: COROT&#8217;s Unusual Catch and More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=281#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>[...] Based on all the Boston results, you have to believe that what Greg Laughlin calls &#8216;transit fever&#8217; is catching hold. Here I have to quote the UC-Santa Cruz astronomer, recently back from the abovementioned IAU meeting. Calling this the most exciting conference he ever attended, Laughlin adds: Planetary transits are no longer the big deal of the future. Theyâ€™re the big deal of the right here right now. Spitzer, Epoxi, MOST, HST and CoRoT are firing on all cylinders. The ground-based surveys are delivering bizarre worlds by the dozen. And weâ€™re clearly in the midst of very rapid improvement of our understanding of the atmospheres and interiors of the planets that are being discovered. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Based on all the Boston results, you have to believe that what Greg Laughlin calls &#8216;transit fever&#8217; is catching hold. Here I have to quote the UC-Santa Cruz astronomer, recently back from the abovementioned IAU meeting. Calling this the most exciting conference he ever attended, Laughlin adds: Planetary transits are no longer the big deal of the future. Theyâ€™re the big deal of the right here right now. Spitzer, Epoxi, MOST, HST and CoRoT are firing on all cylinders. The ground-based surveys are delivering bizarre worlds by the dozen. And weâ€™re clearly in the midst of very rapid improvement of our understanding of the atmospheres and interiors of the planets that are being discovered. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog de Astronomia do astroPT &#187; Super-Terra Ã  Vista !</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog de Astronomia do astroPT &#187; Super-Terra Ã  Vista !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=281#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>[...] Segundo este artigo na ScienceNews, cujo teor Ã© confirmado por este resumo disponibilizado no blog do Projecto Systemic, parece que muito em breve (Junho) vamos ter vÃ¡rios anÃºncios de descobertas de Super-Terras pela equipa da Universidade de Genebra. Note-se que estas Super-Terras orbitam anÃ£s do tipo F,G ou K ! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Segundo este artigo na ScienceNews, cujo teor Ã© confirmado por este resumo disponibilizado no blog do Projecto Systemic, parece que muito em breve (Junho) vamos ter vÃ¡rios anÃºncios de descobertas de Super-Terras pela equipa da Universidade de Genebra. Note-se que estas Super-Terras orbitam anÃ£s do tipo F,G ou K ! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=281#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>Hi Hungry4info2,

Indeed! I&#039;ve put in the links (two instead of three). 

Also, for the record, I should point out that Osmium is a viable ingredient for a CoRoT-Exo-3b model only if the radius turns out to be larger than the reported radius at the ~2 sigma level. Otherwise, it&#039;ll have to be finessed with some sort of servomagnet set up.

cheers,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hungry4info2,</p>
<p>Indeed! I&#8217;ve put in the links (two instead of three). </p>
<p>Also, for the record, I should point out that Osmium is a viable ingredient for a CoRoT-Exo-3b model only if the radius turns out to be larger than the reported radius at the ~2 sigma level. Otherwise, it&#8217;ll have to be finessed with some sort of servomagnet set up.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry4info2</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/05/25/worlds-worlds-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry4info2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=281#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Greg, I think you forgot some links.

&quot;The Mu Arae planets (including the hot Neptune on the 9.6-day orbit, see here, here and here) are all present and accounted for.&quot;

No links =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I think you forgot some links.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Mu Arae planets (including the hot Neptune on the 9.6-day orbit, see here, here and here) are all present and accounted for.&#8221;</p>
<p>No links =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

