<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1:1 eccentric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2008/03/30/11-eccentric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2008/03/30/11-eccentric/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/03/30/11-eccentric/comment-page-1/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=273#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy,

If memory serves, I think that the Gozdziewski and Konacki solutions are indeed a specific example of the 1:1 eccentric resonance. There&#039;s a huge variety of available configurations once mutual inclination is allowed. It would be interesting to watch them vibrate in 3D over secular time scales.

In the rotating reference frame, one sees that the 1:1 resonance is indeed a retrograde quasi-satellite.

best,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p>
<p>If memory serves, I think that the Gozdziewski and Konacki solutions are indeed a specific example of the 1:1 eccentric resonance. There&#8217;s a huge variety of available configurations once mutual inclination is allowed. It would be interesting to watch them vibrate in 3D over secular time scales.</p>
<p>In the rotating reference frame, one sees that the 1:1 resonance is indeed a retrograde quasi-satellite.</p>
<p>best,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2008/03/30/11-eccentric/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=273#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>Taking a look at the behaviour of the 1:1 solutions for the HD 128311 and HD 82943 systems proposed by GoÅºdziewski and Konacki, they seem to be doing a similar kind of thing (but with mutual inclination being involved in all the fun as well).

Incidentally, what does this configuration look like in a rotating reference frame? Is it any different from a quasisatellite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a look at the behaviour of the 1:1 solutions for the HD 128311 and HD 82943 systems proposed by GoÅºdziewski and Konacki, they seem to be doing a similar kind of thing (but with mutual inclination being involved in all the fun as well).</p>
<p>Incidentally, what does this configuration look like in a rotating reference frame? Is it any different from a quasisatellite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

