<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD 17156 b</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Manuel</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/comment-page-1/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=242#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

I observed HD17156 in the transit window. Unfortunately the night was windy,
affecting the small telescope so the photometry is not so clear as we would wish. Anybody else observed?

It&#039;s possible that I have a central transit. I can show you some plots if you want.
I will try to observe again on december 3 (I think that is my next opportunity). 

Regards,
Jose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>I observed HD17156 in the transit window. Unfortunately the night was windy,<br />
affecting the small telescope so the photometry is not so clear as we would wish. Anybody else observed?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible that I have a central transit. I can show you some plots if you want.<br />
I will try to observe again on december 3 (I think that is my next opportunity). </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Jose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - HD 17156 at inferior conjunction (right now!)</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - HD 17156 at inferior conjunction (right now!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=242#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s 01:58 UT Sep. 10, and HD 17156 has moved into its transit window. Hopefully photometric transit observers across Europe have clear skies. If you&#8217;re collecting data, drop us a note on the comments page! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s 01:58 UT Sep. 10, and HD 17156 has moved into its transit window. Hopefully photometric transit observers across Europe have clear skies. If you&#8217;re collecting data, drop us a note on the comments page! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=242#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>Would a 500 K object be able to form water clouds? If I take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this phase diagram of water&lt;/a&gt;, it seems the pressure at which water condenses at 500 K is a few tens of atmospheres, but wouldn&#039;t the planet be warmer at that depth?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2003ApJ...588.1121S&amp;db_key=AST&amp;nosetcookie=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sudarsky et al. (2003)&lt;/a&gt; states that &quot;H2O will condense homogeneously at temperatures below ~250 K&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a 500 K object be able to form water clouds? If I take a look at <a href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html" rel="nofollow">this phase diagram of water</a>, it seems the pressure at which water condenses at 500 K is a few tens of atmospheres, but wouldn&#8217;t the planet be warmer at that depth?</p>
<p><a href="http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2003ApJ...588.1121S&amp;db_key=AST&amp;nosetcookie=1" rel="nofollow">Sudarsky et al. (2003)</a> states that &#8220;H2O will condense homogeneously at temperatures below ~250 K&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/comment-page-1/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=242#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>Hi Luis,

Thanks very much for that link! That&#039;s quite an informative blog article, and it sounds like CoRoT is doing a a very good job.

It&#039;ll be very interesting to see more details with respect to their 33-day transiting planet. That object will be right on the ~500K borderline of being able to form water clouds in its atmosphere, and may even be cycling back and forth between clear and cloudy weather.

I&#039;ll do my best to get the word out worldwide regarding the HD 17156 opportunity on the 10th. I&#039;d have a ready-made systemic post if an ad-hoc group of small telescope observers were to scoop a 150-million Euro mission ;) 

best,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luis,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for that link! That&#8217;s quite an informative blog article, and it sounds like CoRoT is doing a a very good job.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be very interesting to see more details with respect to their 33-day transiting planet. That object will be right on the ~500K borderline of being able to form water clouds in its atmosphere, and may even be cycling back and forth between clear and cloudy weather.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do my best to get the word out worldwide regarding the HD 17156 opportunity on the 10th. I&#8217;d have a ready-made systemic post if an ad-hoc group of small telescope observers were to scoop a 150-million Euro mission ;) </p>
<p>best,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/09/04/hd-17156-b/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=242#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

actually, I think someone attempting this must hurry. The COROT project informally announced at the European Planetary Science Conference that they have a 33 day period transiting planet candidate. It seems that they are already doing the radial velocity follow-up of the candidate.

Check out this blog entry:

http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001089/

Cheers,

Luis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>actually, I think someone attempting this must hurry. The COROT project informally announced at the European Planetary Science Conference that they have a 33 day period transiting planet candidate. It seems that they are already doing the radial velocity follow-up of the candidate.</p>
<p>Check out this blog entry:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001089/" rel="nofollow">http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001089/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Luis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

