<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: time series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2007/05/01/time-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2007/05/01/time-series/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/05/01/time-series/comment-page-1/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=200#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>fivemack,

you got it! I wanted to pick (1) something totally unrelated to astronomy that (2) had weird structure in order to show that a multi-Keplerian model can fit just about anything.

Don&#039;t put any money on that prediction.

best,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fivemack,</p>
<p>you got it! I wanted to pick (1) something totally unrelated to astronomy that (2) had weird structure in order to show that a multi-Keplerian model can fit just about anything.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t put any money on that prediction.</p>
<p>best,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric F Diaz</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/05/01/time-series/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric F Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=200#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>The data stream looks vaguely familiar, but I can&#039;t quite remember to which system it belongs. That is truly unbelievable how the &quot;crazy&quot; six-planet Keplerian system does a fine job of fitting the data. Maybe, I should try &quot;crazy&quot; more often in my fits. Just kidding. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data stream looks vaguely familiar, but I can&#8217;t quite remember to which system it belongs. That is truly unbelievable how the &#8220;crazy&#8221; six-planet Keplerian system does a fine job of fitting the data. Maybe, I should try &#8220;crazy&#8221; more often in my fits. Just kidding. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivemack</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/05/01/time-series/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>fivemack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=200#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>From the range of values, that looks like the stock market VIX index, and indeed the charts seem to match.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EVIX&amp;t=5y&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=

I suppose that Keplerian models aren&#039;t very good at matching the secular exponential trend underlying value rather than derivative indices.

Please don&#039;t go off and turn into a quantitive analyst; extrasolar planets are much more exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the range of values, that looks like the stock market VIX index, and indeed the charts seem to match.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EVIX&#038;t=5y&#038;l=on&#038;z=m&#038;q=l&#038;c" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EVIX&#038;t=5y&#038;l=on&#038;z=m&#038;q=l&#038;c</a>=</p>
<p>I suppose that Keplerian models aren&#8217;t very good at matching the secular exponential trend underlying value rather than derivative indices.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t go off and turn into a quantitive analyst; extrasolar planets are much more exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

