<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GJ 6-7-4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2007/04/06/gj-6-7-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2007/04/06/gj-6-7-4/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - Bali Hai</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/04/06/gj-6-7-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - Bali Hai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=199#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>[...] No word yet on whether that newly discovered 11 Earth-mass (and possibly rocky) planet orbiting GJ 674 is transiting or not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No word yet on whether that newly discovered 11 Earth-mass (and possibly rocky) planet orbiting GJ 674 is transiting or not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borislav_</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/04/06/gj-6-7-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Borislav_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=199#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>total - 10 - hot neptune 
4 around Ðœ, 6 around G and K star 
period around Ðœ - 2,5,5,3 days ; average = 4 days 
period around G and K - 9, 10, 3, 15, 17, 4 days ; average = 10 days 
radius orbits G and K - 0.1 a.u., M - 0.04 a.u. 
diametr Ðœ =(150/0.3)=0.002 a.u. 
diametr G =(1/150)=0.007 a.u. 
geometric probability G = 14%, M = 5% 
total geometric probability hot neptune = 14%*6 + 5%*4=84%+20%=104% !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>total &#8211; 10 &#8211; hot neptune<br />
4 around Ðœ, 6 around G and K star<br />
period around Ðœ &#8211; 2,5,5,3 days ; average = 4 days<br />
period around G and K &#8211; 9, 10, 3, 15, 17, 4 days ; average = 10 days<br />
radius orbits G and K &#8211; 0.1 a.u., M &#8211; 0.04 a.u.<br />
diametr Ðœ =(150/0.3)=0.002 a.u.<br />
diametr G =(1/150)=0.007 a.u.<br />
geometric probability G = 14%, M = 5%<br />
total geometric probability hot neptune = 14%*6 + 5%*4=84%+20%=104% !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A New Red Dwarf Planet</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/04/06/gj-6-7-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A New Red Dwarf Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=199#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re not down to Earth-mass planets yet, but this is an interesting find. This is the second-closest known planetary system (after Epsilon Eridani). GJ 674 is less than 15 light years away and it&#8217;s one of the brightest M dwarfs in our field of view. That makes the transit situation interesting, as Greg Laughlin noted in this systemic post: At first glance, such an effort might appear to be hampered by the fact that the star is young enough to show significant photometric variability in synch with its 35-day rotation period. A central transit, however, would have a duration of only ~80 minutes â€” much shorter than starspot-induced variations â€” and would generate a clearly detectable dip of at least ~0.5% photometric depth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re not down to Earth-mass planets yet, but this is an interesting find. This is the second-closest known planetary system (after Epsilon Eridani). GJ 674 is less than 15 light years away and it&#8217;s one of the brightest M dwarfs in our field of view. That makes the transit situation interesting, as Greg Laughlin noted in this systemic post: At first glance, such an effort might appear to be hampered by the fact that the star is young enough to show significant photometric variability in synch with its 35-day rotation period. A central transit, however, would have a duration of only ~80 minutes â€” much shorter than starspot-induced variations â€” and would generate a clearly detectable dip of at least ~0.5% photometric depth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

