<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy New Anomalistic Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.

You know, this Cassini state 2 speculation leads me to the following questions: is it likely that terrestrial planets (as opposed to gas giants) could end up in this configuration, and could a terrestrial planet in this configuration at the right distance from its star support a habitable climate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.</p>
<p>You know, this Cassini state 2 speculation leads me to the following questions: is it likely that terrestrial planets (as opposed to gas giants) could end up in this configuration, and could a terrestrial planet in this configuration at the right distance from its star support a habitable climate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Eric Algol just told me that the new observations are at 8-microns, which could well explain the difference with the UpsAnd results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Algol just told me that the new observations are at 8-microns, which could well explain the difference with the UpsAnd results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-903</guid>
		<description>On the Cassini state 2 simulations -- we&#039;ve got the results, and the paper just came back from review at ApJL. I&#039;ll be writing a detailed post very shortly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Cassini state 2 simulations &#8212; we&#8217;ve got the results, and the paper just came back from review at ApJL. I&#8217;ll be writing a detailed post very shortly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy,

Thanks for that news. That&#039;s extremely interesting. Do you know which Spitzer bands they used? The Ups And observaton was at 24 microns, where the atmospheric opacity is quite high. At high opacity, you&#039;re seeing a low-pressure upper layer in the atmosphere which has a small heat capacity, which could explain the discrepancy if they observed at, say, 8 microns.

best,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p>
<p>Thanks for that news. That&#8217;s extremely interesting. Do you know which Spitzer bands they used? The Ups And observaton was at 24 microns, where the atmospheric opacity is quite high. At high opacity, you&#8217;re seeing a low-pressure upper layer in the atmosphere which has a small heat capacity, which could explain the discrepancy if they observed at, say, 8 microns.</p>
<p>best,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-892</guid>
		<description>Talking of anomalies, it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.physorg.com/news87569648.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;looks like the planets of 51 Peg, HD 179949 and HD 209458 do not have the extreme temperature variations of Upsilon Andromedae b&lt;/a&gt;. Which makes Upsilon Andromedae rather anomalous, no?

Any word on how Cassini state 2 looks in the infrared?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking of anomalies, it <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news87569648.html" rel="nofollow">looks like the planets of 51 Peg, HD 179949 and HD 209458 do not have the extreme temperature variations of Upsilon Andromedae b</a>. Which makes Upsilon Andromedae rather anomalous, no?</p>
<p>Any word on how Cassini state 2 looks in the infrared?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Remembering &#8216;The Midnight Sun&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2007/01/04/happy-new-anomalistic-year/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Remembering &#8216;The Midnight Sun&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=179#comment-820</guid>
		<description>[...] A recent post by Greg Laughlin on his systemic site triggers memories of a Twilight Zone episode called &#8220;The Midnight Sun.&#8221; Laughlin (UC-SC) was speculating about what would happen to the Earth&#8217;s orbit if the Solar System were disrupted by another star. That inevitably called up the still vivid image of two women sweltering in a New York apartment (one of them, the actress Lois Nettleton, is pictured above). The plot: The Earth has moved closer to the Sun, and all hell is about to break loose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A recent post by Greg Laughlin on his systemic site triggers memories of a Twilight Zone episode called &#8220;The Midnight Sun.&#8221; Laughlin (UC-SC) was speculating about what would happen to the Earth&#8217;s orbit if the Solar System were disrupted by another star. That inevitably called up the still vivid image of two women sweltering in a New York apartment (one of them, the actress Lois Nettleton, is pictured above). The plot: The Earth has moved closer to the Sun, and all hell is about to break loose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

