<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pseudo-synchronization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - &#8220;With all possible expedition&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - &#8220;With all possible expedition&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>[...] Gl 436 b&#8217;s high eccentricity means that, like Jupiter&#8217;s moon Io, it&#8217;s experiencing a lot of tidal heating. It&#8217;s internal luminosity is likely of order 10^20 Watts, which is in the rough ballpark of the amount of energy that the planet intercepts from the red dwarf parent star. Another interesting consequence of the non-zero eccentricity is that &#8220;b&#8221; will have a pseudo-synchronous spin period. That is, tidal forces will have forced the planet into a rotational period of 2.29 days, which allows it to optimally show one face to the star during the peri-astron passages when the tidal forces are strongest. Jonathan Langton has done a simulation of the surface flow pattern (assuming a water-vapor atmosphere). The following 1.1MB animations (&#8220;eastern&#8221; view, and &#8220;western&#8221; view) trace two full orbits in the planet&#8217;s frame, and show the slow synodic drift of the baking daylit hemisphere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gl 436 b&#8217;s high eccentricity means that, like Jupiter&#8217;s moon Io, it&#8217;s experiencing a lot of tidal heating. It&#8217;s internal luminosity is likely of order 10^20 Watts, which is in the rough ballpark of the amount of energy that the planet intercepts from the red dwarf parent star. Another interesting consequence of the non-zero eccentricity is that &#8220;b&#8221; will have a pseudo-synchronous spin period. That is, tidal forces will have forced the planet into a rotational period of 2.29 days, which allows it to optimally show one face to the star during the peri-astron passages when the tidal forces are strongest. Jonathan Langton has done a simulation of the surface flow pattern (assuming a water-vapor atmosphere). The following 1.1MB animations (&#8220;eastern&#8221; view, and &#8220;western&#8221; view) trace two full orbits in the planet&#8217;s frame, and show the slow synodic drift of the baking daylit hemisphere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - The Perfect Storm</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - The Perfect Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>[...] With its eccentricity of 0.3, HD 185269b should have long since been delivered into a state of spin pseudosynchronization, in which it spins roughly three times on its axis for every two trips around the parent star. This state of affairs prevents a steady state flow pattern from developing, and hence the weather on this world is likely to be much more interesting than on your standard-issue tidally circularized hot Jupiter. Furthermore, the amount of energy absorbed by the planet is 345% greater at periastron than at apastron, which will also contribute to a strong &#8220;seasonal&#8221; variation during the planet&#8217;s 6.838-day year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With its eccentricity of 0.3, HD 185269b should have long since been delivered into a state of spin pseudosynchronization, in which it spins roughly three times on its axis for every two trips around the parent star. This state of affairs prevents a steady state flow pattern from developing, and hence the weather on this world is likely to be much more interesting than on your standard-issue tidally circularized hot Jupiter. Furthermore, the amount of energy absorbed by the planet is 345% greater at periastron than at apastron, which will also contribute to a strong &#8220;seasonal&#8221; variation during the planet&#8217;s 6.838-day year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - HD 118206&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - HD 118206&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>[...] In looking over the latest officially published additions to the catalog of extrasolar planets, I noticed that there&#8217;s a very interesting object &#8212; HD 118203b &#8212; that straddles the extremes of the circular hot Jupiters and the ultra-eccentric HD 80606b. This planet was discovered in 2005 by the Swiss Team, has an orbital period of 6.13 days, a mass at least twice that of Jupiter, and a well-determined eccentricity, e=0.3. HD 118203b therefore won&#8217;t be spin-synchronous. Rather, as is also the case with HD 80606b (see the diagram here), it&#8217;ll have been forced into a state of pseudo-synchronous rotation, in which it does its best to keep one face toward the star during the periastron passage. Its day should be 64.8% as long as its year: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In looking over the latest officially published additions to the catalog of extrasolar planets, I noticed that there&#8217;s a very interesting object &#8212; HD 118203b &#8212; that straddles the extremes of the circular hot Jupiters and the ultra-eccentric HD 80606b. This planet was discovered in 2005 by the Swiss Team, has an orbital period of 6.13 days, a mass at least twice that of Jupiter, and a well-determined eccentricity, e=0.3. HD 118203b therefore won&#8217;t be spin-synchronous. Rather, as is also the case with HD 80606b (see the diagram here), it&#8217;ll have been forced into a state of pseudo-synchronous rotation, in which it does its best to keep one face toward the star during the periastron passage. Its day should be 64.8% as long as its year: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - &#8230;and then the clouds lifted</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - &#8230;and then the clouds lifted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>[...] I drove up to Berkeley yesterday to give a talk about my second-favorite planet &#8212; HD 80606 b. A good fraction of the keynote slides in the talk were new, and so I wound up spending most of the weekend scrambling to get my story straight and to get the talk together. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I drove up to Berkeley yesterday to give a talk about my second-favorite planet &#8212; HD 80606 b. A good fraction of the keynote slides in the talk were new, and so I wound up spending most of the weekend scrambling to get my story straight and to get the talk together. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregas</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>gregas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg

Do you know of any attempts to &quot;catch&quot; 0606.
I considered it for a second but my wife and family talked me out of it.


Happy New Year</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg</p>
<p>Do you know of any attempts to &#8220;catch&#8221; 0606.<br />
I considered it for a second but my wife and family talked me out of it.</p>
<p>Happy New Year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry4info</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry4info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-625</guid>
		<description>I probably sound like a perfectionist... but... Using the formula you posted, I got 1.53596885.
Rounding to three places, you get 1.536, not 1.535. I mean no disrepsect, as I have the highest reverence for your work here.

Excellent site, very uplifting information, beautiful work. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably sound like a perfectionist&#8230; but&#8230; Using the formula you posted, I got 1.53596885.<br />
Rounding to three places, you get 1.536, not 1.535. I mean no disrepsect, as I have the highest reverence for your work here.</p>
<p>Excellent site, very uplifting information, beautiful work. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy, 

Drake Deming and I are going to submit a proposal for the next cycle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy, </p>
<p>Drake Deming and I are going to submit a proposal for the next cycle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/12/11/pseudo-synchronization/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=176#comment-598</guid>
		<description>You mention Spitzer here... are there actually plans to observe HD 80606 with Spitzer during the upcoming periastron passage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention Spitzer here&#8230; are there actually plans to observe HD 80606 with Spitzer during the upcoming periastron passage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

