<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting HD 99429 ready for its screen test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oklo.org/2006/02/02/getting-hd-99429-ready-for-its-screen-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oklo.org/2006/02/02/getting-hd-99429-ready-for-its-screen-test/</link>
	<description>characterizing planetary systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: systemic - Dexter</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/02/02/getting-hd-99429-ready-for-its-screen-test/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>systemic - Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=27#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] In a previous post, I wrote about why I can certainly appreciate the planet detection teams&#8217; reasons for not wanting to divulge their radial velocity data when they announce a new planet. If a star has one detectable planet, then the odds are about 50-50 that another planet will be detected after several additional years of monitoring. For a variety of reasons, multiple-planet systems are scientifically more valuable than single-planet systems. In particular, a multiple-planet system (such as GJ 876) tells a fascinating dynamical story, which in turn yields valuable information about the formation and evolution of the planetary system. Obtaining radial velocities is hard, expensive work. It&#8217;s a whack move when some player-hater jacks your hard-earned data to get a roll on their own opportunisitic Doppler velocity monitoring program. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a previous post, I wrote about why I can certainly appreciate the planet detection teams&#8217; reasons for not wanting to divulge their radial velocity data when they announce a new planet. If a star has one detectable planet, then the odds are about 50-50 that another planet will be detected after several additional years of monitoring. For a variety of reasons, multiple-planet systems are scientifically more valuable than single-planet systems. In particular, a multiple-planet system (such as GJ 876) tells a fascinating dynamical story, which in turn yields valuable information about the formation and evolution of the planetary system. Obtaining radial velocities is hard, expensive work. It&#8217;s a whack move when some player-hater jacks your hard-earned data to get a roll on their own opportunisitic Doppler velocity monitoring program. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Find a Transiting Planet</title>
		<link>http://oklo.org/2006/02/02/getting-hd-99429-ready-for-its-screen-test/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Find a Transiting Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oklo.org/?p=27#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyone involved in exoplanetary science shares a common dream: a view of a blue and green world returned from an advanced imaging system of the sort that may one day fly aboard Terrestrial Planet Finder or other missions. But as we wait for breakthroughs in space-based hardware, planetary detections keep occurring. And astronomer Greg Laughlin (University of California, Santa Cruz) has a thought on what we might find using today&#8217;s technologies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyone involved in exoplanetary science shares a common dream: a view of a blue and green world returned from an advanced imaging system of the sort that may one day fly aboard Terrestrial Planet Finder or other missions. But as we wait for breakthroughs in space-based hardware, planetary detections keep occurring. And astronomer Greg Laughlin (University of California, Santa Cruz) has a thought on what we might find using today&#8217;s technologies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

